[Blabber] Passive Wifi offering a 10, 000x reduction in power consumption for remote Wifi nodes
guan at yang.dk
Fri Apr 1 16:11:59 UTC 2016
This confuses me a little bit. I thought I understood the pros and cons when this was publicized - you waste a lot of power transmitting all over the place in case someone wants to transmit. But the benefit was that this would integrate with existing wi-fi networks. If you don't need Wi-Fi compatibility, you might be able to energy harvest enough energy for a lower power network, or find some other solution.
But I don't quite understand the concept of a device that only transmits, and does not receive, wi-fi signals. This works for a wireless protocol that supports that, but for Wi-Fi, it seems such a node would not be able to integrate very well with an existing Wi-Fi network. How would it receive acknowledgments and retransmit, for example?
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:06, John Larson <larsonj.home at gmail.com> wrote:
> An interesting development on the low power wifi front from our friends at the Univ of Washington, CS Dept <http://passivewifi.cs.washington.edu/>. They are promising a 10,000x reduction in power consumption for passive wifi nodes that transmit (but do not receive) wifi signals.
> This is perfect for cloud enabled embedded wireless sensor applications. Of course wifi range limitations still apply but it is an important breakthrough for simplifying integration (and hopefully cost) of embedded wireless applications with the cloud.
> Wired published an article <http://www.wired.com/2016/03/future-wi-fi-10000-times-energy-efficient/> about it in march.
> Emerging Tech like this is going to make integration with OT networks a lot more palatable for some significant IoT use cases. Its not available yet but it looks like something to keep an eye on.
> Blabber mailing list Blabber at list.hackmanhattan.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Blabber